In this way, Eliot makes Casaubon a figure of sympathy, even stating "I am very sorry for him." He remains the same ungenerous and paranoid man he has been since his introduction but with the addition of "melancholy embitterment." He is embittered by his futile attempts to gain traction in academia. Years of hard work have produced nothing by which his name will be remembered. Despite the tough exterior, Casaubon is truly sensitive to ridicule from critics. All he wants is to be accepted as a serious scholar. His rejection by his colleagues causes him to feel inadequate and insubstantial:
It is an
uneasy lot at best, to be what we call highly taught and yet not to
enjoy: to be present at this great spectacle of life and never to be
liberated from a small hungry shivering self—never to be fully
possessed by the glory we behold, never to have our consciousness
rapturously transformed into the vividness of a thought, the ardor of a
passion, the energy of an action, but always to be scholarly and
uninspired, ambitious and timid, scrupulous and dim-sighted (Ch. 29).
Casaubon has visions of greatness that have never been realized.
However, in drawing the reader's sympathy, a sympathy that Casaubon would be too proud to acknowledge but would desperately want to embrace, Eliot does not try to hide his flaws. Casaubon lacks the passion needed to research and write a work of the magnitude he desires. He cares more deeply about making a reputation for himself while proving people wrong than the subject he is studying. He has an "egoistic scrupulosity" that fails to provide the motivation to complete the work. He self-centered perspective causes him to suspect even his wife of not believing in him, despite her help. Still, the reader pities this man whose insecurities are partly to blame for his lack of success.
Hey Marcus,
ReplyDeleteMy name is Megan and I'm a student intern at FindTheBest. I love your blog and would like to feature it on FindTheBest's Blog Comparison. If you are interested, please email me at mfunk(at)findthebest(dot)com and I can send you the details.
Best,
Megan
Hi Marcus, I've been reading your blog awhile and I really like your in-depth analysis. Do you think that George Eliot was somewhat drawn to the Romantic era? She liked to set her books in the 1830's I believe, which is curious in someone known as a major Victorian realist.
ReplyDeleteAs far as Middlemarch is concerned, I think Eliot was drawn to the period due to the many changes that had a lasting impact on society. Those changes had their start in the Romantic era.
Delete